EARTH DAY AND
POPULATION ISSUES
In a special April-May edition for Earth Day
2000, Time magazine examined global population trends in a feature story
and in other articles on biodiversity, water, climate, urban sprawl and wildlife
conservation. The population feature reported on the impact of "adding nearly one new
Germany to the world's population each year," noting that though "birthrates are
easing and the population growth rate is falling," these trends will not continue
"if there is neither the money nor governmental expertise" to carry out family
planning programs. The article described the world consensus reached at the International
Conference on Population and Development, which "acknowledged that giving women more
education and reproductive freedom was the key" to slowing population growth.
Time also profiled the head of the Indian Village Health Nurse Association, Nirmala
Palsamy, as a "Hero for the Planet" because of her efforts to provide
reproductive health care in Tamil Nadu. The story noted that countries like India have
"rejected target-based birth control in favor of giving women better health care and
more family planning choices."
Other media outlets also reported on population and environment issues around Earth Day,
which was April 22. The April 17 Washington Post reported that
"growing demand for resources is threatening the world's environmental health"
in an article describing results from a World Resources Institute study. Newsweek
reported April 24 that "poor countries face the toughest [environmental]
challenge" because "billions of people continue to grapple" with getting
the resources necessary for their daily survival.
Agence France Presse reported April 18 that "unbridled consumerism
in the West and disregard for the environment in developing countries" is
contributing to environmental degradation "as the global population surges from six
billion people today to eight or nine billion in 2050." An April 26 Agence France
Presse story on a Population Action International study of population trends and
biodiversity reported that population growth is placing "enormous pressures on the
environment, through farming, construction, transport, forestry, mining, water use,
tourism and pollution."
OTHER GLOBAL
POPULATION COVERAGE
The April 26 Washington Post
reported that "no country in Europe is producing enough children to replace its
current population, which will lead to a decline in the base of workers contributing to
the pension systems." By contrast, the Associated Press reported
April 26 that "half of the population in Kosovo is under the age of 25 and the infant
mortality is among the highest in Europe."
In Nepal, "population growth has been so rapid that it hindered economic development
in the country," according to an April 18 Xinhua News Agency story.
Xinhua also reported April 25 that "the Sri Lankan government is aiming to reduce the
country's population growth."
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY
PLANNING
The April 30 Associated Press
reported that Vice President Al Gore included international family planning as one of his
foreign policy priorities. In a recent address examining "21st century national
security challenges," Gore included issues such as "global environment and
international family planning, for which Gore supports additional U.S. aid."
In an effort to promote family planning programs and health education, Egypt has launched
the "first Arab TV channel dedicated to health issues," according to the April
20 Associated Press. The channel operates under the supervision of the
Health Ministry, which is seeking in part to combat the "widespread lack of awareness
about sexual education" and "help family planning schemes make headway."
In Canada, the April 16 Edmonton Sun reported that a bill before the
legislature "would prohibit employers from refusing to hire or promote a health
professional" who will not dispense the morning-after pill or take part in any
medical procedure that "offends the health professional's religion or belief that
human life is sacred."
NEWS ABOUT ABORTION
ISSUES
Major media outlets across the United States
reported on Sternberg v. Carhart, the latest abortion case before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case will decide the constitutionality of a Nebraska law that bans so-called
"partial-birth" abortion. While many news stories appeared about the case, The
New York Times on April 23 examined the broader impact of the judgment, which is
expected in July. "Though the justices made it clear that they were not interested in
revisiting the court's precedents that established the constitutional right to
abortion," the case has led to a wider debate on abortion, The Times reported. The
Nebraska law is "identical to the laws in nearly all of the 30 other states that have
enacted such bans," the article noted.
PHILANTHROPISTS AND
POPULATION ISSUES
Bill Gates and the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation were the subject of an April 16 New York Times Magazine cover
story that noted "the aspects of his philanthropical work that he seems most excited
about have to do with redressing tremendous inequities in global health." The Times
reporter traveled to Africa to visit Gates-funded projects on "childhood
immunization, family planning, cervical cancer, malaria, the reduction of maternal and
infant mortality and AIDS." The article reported that the Foundation officers take
"a long-term, strategic view of what their grants can do, and they place strong
emphasis on evaluation procedures."
An April 17 Washington Post article on "where, and when, Gates
gives" also noted the Foundation's giving to UNFPA and family planning organizations.
Ted Turner spoke on population issues at an Earth Day forum, according to the April 22 Associated
Press. Turner indicated that "increasing numbers of people are putting a
harmful burden on the planet's resources" but that "the birth rate is dropping
as people learn about family planning."
OPINIONS &
EDITORIALS
A number of editorials and opinion pieces
followed the April 7 White House World Health Day event on "Saving Women's Lives,
Protecting Women's Health" through international family planning.
An April 22 New York Times editorial stated that "President Clinton
recently called on Congress to raise aid for international family planning by $169 million
next year" to "restore funding to 1995 levels." The editorial noted that
Clinton "is also calling on Congress to abolish the pernicious restriction on
advocacy activities that was imposed on foreign family planning organizations" and
that "Representatives Carolyn Maloney and Nita Lowey, Democrats of New York, are both
sponsoring legislation to end the gag rule."
The Boston Globe published an April 17 editorial on Clinton's request to
Congress to restore international family planning funds to 1995 funding levels and to
remove the ban on foreign groups from "lobbying, advising, or educating about
abortion," which prohibits these groups from "exercising democratic rights in
the own countries." The editorial concluded that while the politicians in the United
States fight over these issues, "women in developing countries die from hemorrhages
in childbirth."
The April 21 Charleston Gazette reprinted excerpts from The Boston Globe
editorial, urging "West Virginia's members of Congress [to] do their utmost to help
President Clinton prevail against" the GOP lawmakers who are fighting restoration of
international family planning funds.
An April 23 commentary in the Palm Beach Post by editorial writer Fran
Hathaway stated that "this year, Congress owes the world's women-big time"
because of the restrictions attached to international family planning funds in last year's
budget.
Tulsa World published an April 29 commentary by Population Institute
President Werner Fornos, which called for restoration of U.S. international family
planning assistance to 1995 levels because "while the emotionally charged verbal
warfare...reverberates under the Capitol dome, 350 million couples in the poorest
countries of the world-where 95 percent of population growth occurs-lack access to a full
range of modern family planning information and affordable services."
In the May 2000 issue of Foreign Affairs, Center for Reproductive Law and
Policy President Janet Benshoof stated in a letter to the editor that "the practice
of hampering overseas organizations that engage in discussions of abortion is called 'the
global gag rule' for good reason," because "Congress penalizes foreign groups
that provide essential (and legal) medical procedures, participate in the democratic
process, and exercise free speech rights."
The New York Times also published two letters to the editor April 16 in
response to an earlier article on Ambassador Richard Holbrooke (March 26) that described
the budget compromise that instituted restrictions on international family planning groups
in return for payment of UN dues. Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) wrote that
"if Holbrooke had stood on principle instead of political convenience, we would have
won UN dues without restrictions on women's health." CEDPA President Peggy Curlin
wrote that the restrictions "deny international family planning programs the right to
express an opinion on the abortion laws in their own countries," which would be
"unconstitutional if applied to groups in the United States."
The above analysis was written by Ketayoun
Darvich-Kodjouri and Kathy Bonk at the Communications Consortium Media Center, 1200 New
York Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005, 202/326-8700.
If you would like your name to be added to their email service, please e-mail your request
to kdarvich@ccmc.org. |